HomeMy WebLinkAbout10181955 ZPC Minutes1~8"
MINUTES QF SP'BCIAL MEETING OF ZONil~a & PLANNING BQARD
QG T(~BER 1$, 195
The Zoning & Planning Board convened in special session on C3etober 1$~
1955, with the following members presents Mr. Sd Uavis, presiding
Messrs. Gordon Bavis~ David Hannah and Charlie Wilson. Messrs. Halbert and
Maley were absent. - -
g request from Mr. Doyle M. May, 3219 University Blvd, for permission to
re air and modernize an existi servan ua rs and to rev~~]aimbi~
an elec ric facilities was considered. .May proposed to make no
ad ions to a existing quarters over the 3 car garage but desired to
make a den eliminating kitchen facilities which"w®re installed when the
building was originally erected in 1925, before passage. of the soning
ordinance; hoKever, he does desire to leave the existing bath facilities.
It was the feeling of the Board that elimination of the< kitchen facilities
would mitigate a potential violation of the. Zoning Qrdinance and for this
reason they unanimously recommended that a permit be issued Mr. May for
remodeling the living quarters in order to make a den and eliminate kitchen
facilities, provided an affidavit is executed that the structure will not
be used for commercial or rental purposes.
Mr. Joseph Marquer, 2616 Amherst Street, and owner of Lots 1, 3 and 5~
oc , rg ou , a sa a request on C}ctober 13~ far per-
mission to erect a lEzx~2 Ft. play room and photographic hobby shop on'
Lot- 5 which he proposed tti combine with an existing accessis~ ding.
that extends onto Lot 3. .The structure would not contain.. kitchen or bath.
facilities but would be iuurnished with gas and lighter Mr. Marquette
residence is located on Lot 1.
Since the present residence and proposed. building would be located on parts
of all three lots, it xas the r~ommendation of the Board that steps be
taken to reconstitute lots 1, 3 & ~-into one lot as izi their opinion this
would be the only way setback requirements could be observed fcr both-
buildings. It was also the. Board's rec~arnendation that the matterbe'
referred to the City Attorney for legal opinion on such action.
With no further-business to come before the Board at this t3me~ upon motion
du],y made, seconded and carried, the meeting was ad3ourz~ed,
oC
HA
GRE
1
1