The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04132006 ZPC MinutesCity of `vest University Place A Neighborhood City ® Recycled Paver ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION BILL WATSON CONFERENCE ROOM 3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD MEETING MINUTES April 13, 2006 MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Brown, Bob Inaba, Michael Silver, and Les Albin COUNCIL: N/A MEMBERS ABSENT: Jeffrey Horowitz, Beth Beloff and Mac McManus STAFF PRESENT: Ron Wicker, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director, Sallye A. Clark, Planning Assistant and James Dougherty, City Attorney Call to Order — With quorum present at 6:07 p.m., Steve Brown called. the meeting to order. 1. Minutes. March 9, 2006: Michael Silver made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Les Albin seconded. Ayes: Steve Brown, Bob Inaba, Michael Silver, and Les Albin Noes: none. Motion passed. Minutes approved. 2. Environmental and "Green" Development. Matters relating to Environmental and "Green" Buildings and Development. Bob Inaba, ZPC member gave a power point presentation. Bob stated that he spoke to the USGB Council and they are starting a pilot program in September and that West U could be a part of the pilot program. Steve Brown Chairman would like this item to be placed on next month's agenda again for those ZPC members who were not in attendance at the meeting. There was also discussion about a possible convenient time for City Council and BSC to view the presentation. 3. Topics for review for 2006 — 2007. ZPC discussed a "draft" of topics for review. Prioritization of the topics was discussed again. It was a consensus of ZPC and staff that the Chapter 20 update be put on hold until a City Planner is hired to work on this item with the City Attorney. 4. Framed Area and Related Regulations; Amendments. Four draft amendments were discussed on old stock housing, front porch height, buildings in rear yard and 10 plate height limit. ZPC requested Jim Dougherty to make revisions and bring them back for further discussion at next month's meeting. 3800 University Boulevard • West University Place, Texas 77005 -2899 • 713.668.4441 • www.westu.org `Zoning & Planning Commission Minutes April 13, 2006 Meeting Page 2 of 2 5. Town Center and Commercial Areas; PDD's. Bob Inaba presented a cost analysis and updated picture for possible street enhancement on Edloe, see picture. The board discussed the Qualified- Pedestrian Enhancement Development draft amendment. This change would require applicant to come before the ZPC then get final approval from City Council for a Special Use Permit. ZPC requested Jim Dougherty to revise the amendment and bring it back for further discussion at next month's meeting. Adjournment. Les Albin made a motion to adjourn. Michael Silver seconded. Ayes: Steve Brown, Bob Inaba, Michael Silver, and Les Albin. Noes: none. Motion passed. Meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Attachments: Green Building Power Point Presentation handout by Bob Inaba Possible topics for review 2006 -2007 (dated March 2006) Amendment relating to buildings in rear yard (Table 7 -6) dated 4 -7 -06 Amendment relating to front porch height dated 4 -7 -06 Alternate amendments relating to "old stock housing" (definition) dated 4 -7 -06 Amendment to add "plate height" limit dated 4 -13 -06 Amendment to provide for "Qualified Pedestrian- Enhancement Developments" or "QPED's" dated 4 -7 -06 Edloe Street Landscape Improvements Preliminary Budget Information by Bob Inaba, dated 4 -13 -2006 • Photo from Bob Inaba of possible street enhancement on Edloe PASSED THIS DAY, OF , 2006. ATTEST: (Afij,T a, Sallye A. Clark lanning Assistant • Steve Brown, Presiding Officer • • QiluchvnerrF io �i3)lXo Zpc, rr)Ttin�C mlnuf25 is green bu ildin t_ C why wouldn't you do it? tednv. M.d..d. ty f R"—s .b..f.N.m .ad t.n...r SMW now _d Sit 9..ab al %�p tiproacdvfty $3001C/vw Wo S75.000 ra a ti Mm dp.etp.n ' •Buildings that are "Amnnnraelly responsible, profitable, and hoahhy plum to Ov%and worlr C..W,AM . ant.mb 6dstlrp rwnaopenso-atepl.. SM E" -Tear app, en tfW.m .a.r.ebsemb S-W /WM v bW f— 20%- 50%a. COanpn. The IM F%M Ill' n... •f. rAw..r..�....e.%•ar. sarm Pn3r OMW LeamWng .�..�.'fY.�.r•r.r4r0�YilV Mff.n DAYLIGHTING initia""e t « _ Page 1 65.MOMIU.S..l.p tdt'f Wna.np , > 35%a tda U8. Pv_v enaar m - 30%du Us.a.W —of tsdal.- 135 aa0on -A d paKbl ow fam ft l dp vacs ti M U.S. (sperm. 21 Wpdw~ 12%d po"bN w.tr N rte U.S. .0% 13 Estero 1dd a.. W d rmv rmudeN up deoaa� COM—W and .*d." Opae/f. absSeN ..mwri. Mrbrmmc. A $100.050 i mint U a argy asap n91 Wooft m a! S&P 600 by duds M.--d adldba V.t..W. V-la d no opera" r,oap. pAp . h—ed b."v amot v RWw. W Waq a19ov. fLtll Aa.naOanwq abrPb Inpfo..awb b IWmr e.aln.a.b MouW* ou.a. Berkeley T.ab UOM solo."1b.1MCr Cmt..d Aw%t...w Cma1...w5N PAR*Ma MISS-- a % -20% Aaadm and Aaa.M -15 %- 2611 N —P.ddp HWM aM O —WW oft ft- 25%-60% La.t w.M and Nmtta C.n C S.A." - 511m5.abMknff Y" l.vY.or.f.l a..Mb • Reolbe err OrQWS d re W rmaaa camnWan C.mm..lry Nmab • A.vianla wNnmlppal YdrM.u(9.m ar0aMwe a.av d W. e.m«r. Nr11r. • „sue aN batdm ene II.afM and Nbb a...ab • Edieic. draped carmen atl Maly nn 1? tednv. M.d..d. ty f R"—s .b..f.N.m .ad t.n...r SMW now _d Sit 9..ab al %�p tiproacdvfty $3001C/vw Wo S75.000 ra a ti Mm dp.etp.n ' •Buildings that are "Amnnnraelly responsible, profitable, and hoahhy plum to Ov%and worlr C..W,AM . ant.mb 6dstlrp rwnaopenso-atepl.. SM E" -Tear app, en tfW.m .a.r.ebsemb S-W /WM v bW f— 20%- 50%a. COanpn. The IM F%M Ill' n... •f. rAw..r..�....e.%•ar. sarm Pn3r OMW LeamWng .�..�.'fY.�.r•r.r4r0�YilV Mff.n DAYLIGHTING initia""e t « _ Page 1 65.MOMIU.S..l.p tdt'f Wna.np , > 35%a tda U8. Pv_v enaar m - 30%du Us.a.W —of tsdal.- 135 aa0on -A d paKbl ow fam ft l dp vacs ti M U.S. (sperm. 21 Wpdw~ 12%d po"bN w.tr N rte U.S. .0% 13 Estero 1dd a.. W d rmv rmudeN up deoaa� COM—W and .*d." Opae/f. absSeN ..mwri. Mrbrmmc. A $100.050 i mint U a argy asap n91 Wooft m a! S&P 600 by duds M.--d adldba V.t..W. V-la d no opera" r,oap. pAp . h—ed b."v amot v RWw. W Waq a19ov. fLtll Aa.naOanwq abrPb Inpfo..awb b IWmr e.aln.a.b MouW* ou.a. Berkeley T.ab UOM solo."1b.1MCr Cmt..d Aw%t...w Cma1...w5N PAR*Ma MISS-- a % -20% Aaadm and Aaa.M -15 %- 2611 N —P.ddp HWM aM O —WW oft ft- 25%-60% La.t w.M and Nmtta C.n C S.A." - 511m5.abMknff Y" C� • • Qi4hima1f tO BJDo 7jzYn2dlrYjminu#c5 - M.-9 • Rational nbFVdti woulu"on Wa 6.000. M bm(Coapffdw Vou"ay, d"_ -mObWe oDaraato- DpnwnWt on dplw • To 1laattb.blY W_ bA*Q owlon Popov or to Napa4 Laati EA • DewMpar aiM admr* ...0.61y d 6M Clk— e,ddnp Reap Sy-- LEED. 13 ao, C.w.a P.* u a saw Rgbl..e Pram w1alo a,-rw :' err ndw+.r L That Ls 6%d all new mr4trW Ion prOa= In the U.S. Registered Projects By O%ner PELauL �� Ootrn%Brt 2% PROM OT161 a% WI�p101T13N h tDx (.b16MBR 12% IDOK 00 9VAeM IIGInOM 2i4 WIppN110N Ne ML E- E D • twMlryMy� aaMEw• br Mala.taa. eaw,a•.NNp� .e� ownMn w. %M.sea arM...w I.atlaVp. -Registered Projects By State 40100,000 . State n.000 000 --•••t '51W.000 20100.000 K. 23100100 a�.00n.000 AY F— N_j&_y ,3.000.000 MIw York Ow" r t L 10000,000 AUldr, T— ;. 3,000100 LB m` adeda, Cdoa coot CO/vy, Wda swim GYo i, San Labsc domw pg 0 SIettY. W" *VW Ka Oily, LOamPI 6% M Lor Mg". Caab'Na d 356 123 I t$ 122 ,W 9a Be W 70 67 CA rv, WA PA OR TX .. . .1L K awb wd N — M ft.1 -- Y LEM • Federal . State DeparMMrK DI &WW AONky D�pb'ana/K dOrS LAM Gu fS=S,Ad &rf—em AY F— N_j&_y N.7 Anr6 MIw York Ow" • AA1rlioipBl Panes)y✓uaa AUldr, T— PbabM. 0"0. CO —EFCNL LB m` adeda, Cdoa coot CO/vy, Wda swim GYo i, San Labsc domw OLDS T_ NoROL 7- SIettY. W" *VW Ka Oily, LOamPI 6% M Lor Mg". Caab'Na Page 2 • Dellne-green' by providing a standard for measurement • Prevem'grWl vashhlp' gebe or emggerated claims) • Pranae.Mlabu6tlfng, integrated design processes • Stimulate green oomperitbn • Establish market value with recognlabb national bran? • 7mrrslartn ttro market0lam -Registered Projects By Blild4lg Type OTRER 7% 1 71IISE 32% aelLTllMar REWIE L 3% CO —EFCNL LB m` OFPCE 3% K -12 1�� EXCA EOL 40- 6% M C 9,13,p CM60.1cR: 1. Cwr111W (26 m 32 poFlb) i tlMr (33.36) 7. Oew (30M51) l w — (32. D**O • 34acGVY04 to I 1 3 1w vc-, me6 r� m(nutG G— SLa*v PA v Syd Cereoo is 1. eY7 elta J bry'poiPlOb peY1tr r S Cetrpw4i e bra/ pamli POYRi H 3 mbOPM1 1. ._W ..e •bko.o 1/ btrl W�C+� POirtr b e mywbe l 4Mr1.1..W R--- 1/ 1:/el PCiom4OOfVi %1 I/ mepwMi 0. hde.r C..Irwm..ftl OYllry rs btrrPaubfr Pam b Is mrporer e. May.W..M a•q• ►rs.w s.>rm PP..eIi pehtr h 2 mbpotii W1p).W Atlmgfr.r� Q er*39 wbeelbr. .TOl.itlar brdOmt allrel, tr'V Q.Y%Nh.r1' ov - ORtpnrry Arriwibb0e'q M.41YeN Wia OMkp h enN Ml Mv..tliMe r.eRl NIYMi1 �'n.:.� mww- P—W bk"wiWe —beu►a (' - R.aMCP Lo. NON Cwbw ro ft"P." SP.we'.i UpMAOMI* —Ww OORIT DItr�1341I.g11/wt.V aT® 4Mr1.1..M RMMIaa Aurlee M.eDbattM^Ir ]�9 �4>Y9 /Iki1 Carraauciwr Waite "..V. SParJfY )C.Ye cmakk eblerHh UU.. bmh rnsacei.a n15e.lm Hid AAMyft -Sp4LM CorWAom ►.SG..f Mr ft. ae w.a.....Mp WhO Ilrmwt G ari0- 502e5O 0-D1.1i5 3i bi yA in — 02W 615 CCOicTSw-S3' 0 -A ft-- $3,e- WA%riM U*&M W— EOICW. F - 53.000- 32 W EOk M L.e. krbem- mw� - W% .p &-W MW&O Si tt . � - 532.725- IL1/V. Page 3 W~Veel..ey -7!�W., U. heO.Mci..y hrlmElr. J.lol Pork mM w.Cn{N+fppueWq Webrliii uFNtr LPr -eorF trettl Tubb I Utr4A1tll /LavFbwTPbtr Me.r l..In.s...M C..Yry _ SPOOV b voc nrMfetr Protra ou-1.a4 ew'n4W /mr14Nb1 Hm Ga/*gw" Mae b ft /Ilelwly daaymM faro Cm ti,.lwi- 1- 0— Cmmrcewl L Ca..L cU CM Pr.rr'Iin br LEER CerWk 5m -60 r C res.. -L.wl 0 • • . QitucMvven1-to 1�0� 2V[ ftehl MiOJko-"- w Ca SWIM— C-wucem LOW ooa—eeen.p w- Cr,-'*V ft WOO M . W." .;7 rp.prroreea. 0 L(ED.•ND LIED w NwoY.lpoe Dmopnpru Pe v S)m - Prekwwy D� Sq-- 6.2005 green buildin why wouldn't West U do it? Lm w Q 0 t u Page 4 RAWO Sytm Fa pow LEER-for HO Pmg� L EED �iVoCh�t i� �{I�o�o �c v�e�hv� yn�nu�5 O -i Ll • Page 5 • • ATTACHMENT TO 4 -13 72006 ZPC meeting minutes Possible Topics for Review for 2006 — 2007 March 2006 1. To manage the scale of homes, evaluate modifications to framed area and related regulations including possible changes in, or alternatives to the 80% rule, rear accessory building separation and maximum height in front yards. 2. Evaluate rezoning of commercial areas to allow or facilitate rebuilding and remodeling () Evaluate Garage and Driveway regulations: A. Evaluate garage set back requirements on new or remodeled garages to ensure that sidewalks remain unblocked B. Clarify front facing garage door conditions to be applied only to the first 10 feet from the front yard line. C. Semi - enclosed garage space definition D. Two garage space requirement with exceptions for old stock housing. E. Garage maneuvering area in single family detached (SFD) residential F. Minimum driveway widths for SFD 4. Chapter 20, Subdivision Ordinance update --- RPu.)i k bJTLD nU /06i-u 5. Review height requirements relating to Base Flood Elevation ._ P tmn ff l� or) 45C COModify definition of Old Stock Housing (original square footage too small ?) OPossible limitation of volume of porches that project into front yard. 8. Evaluate allowing fountains, arbors, trellises, sculptures and other similar items to project into yards. 9. Evaluate rezoning of a section of PDD -TH2 into Commercial ,�\\ �VJ VNW ATTACHMENT TO 4 -13 -2006 MEETING MINUTES- ZPC • Amendment relating to buildings in rear yard (Table 7 -6) 4-7-06 Amend Note 3 of Table 7 -6 as follows: Note 3. Buildings In Rear Yard or SF Bufferyard. A detached accessory building may be located in a rear yard or SF Bufferyard if it meets all of the following criteria: (a) No part of it may be closer than five feet to the rear property line (or to any SF District, if in a SF Bufferyard). (b) No part of it may be closer than feet to any principal building on the same site (or to any other building on that site not located completely within the rear ,yard). (l)- LchWithin ten feet of another building site in an SF District (whether on the side, rear or otherwise), it may have no window, door or other opening above the ground floor (and facing the property line of the other building site), except for opaque, non - operable openings or skylights. (e) (d) Space in any projecting building may only be used for single- family (detached) use. W_Le) If there is a "breezeway" connecting the projecting building g, o any other building," it must unenclosed, with a walkway no higher than three feet and a roof no higher than 14 feet. t)" than 600 s"afe, feet of building spaee, ether- than gafage ' . See garage restrictions in Article 10. Di � s� • FroMed Brea. ATTACHMENT TO ZPC 4 -13 -2006 MINUTES • Amendment relating to front porch height 4 -7 -06 Amend Note 1.2 of Table 7 -6 as follows: Note 1.2. Porch In Front Yard. A porch may project up to 120 inches if it meets all of the following criteria: (i) It is neither designed nor usable for motor vehicles; (ii) The volume of the projecting part of the porch does not exceed 50 cubic feet per foot of front street line (Example: the maximum projecting volume on a 52'2 -foot wide site would be 50 cubic feet x 52.5, or 2,625 cubic feet). (iii) The porch's outside perimeter is open and unobstructed, except for the following features: (a) Ordinary window screens. (b) A solid or partially open safety rail not higher than 3.5 feet above the porch floor. (c) Supporting vertical columns, if the total width of the outer faces of the columns does not exceed either 50% of the outside perimeter of the porch or 25% of the theoretical outside perimeter of a maximum -sized porch. The width of a column is measured at its thickest point above 3.5 feet above the porch floor. The "maximum -sized porch" is 120 inches deep and extends from one side yard line to the other, but it is limited by the open area requirement for the front yard. The "outside perimeter" of a porch is the portion of the perimeter out in the front yard; it does not include the portion of the perimeter adjacent to a building or lying along the front setback line. (iv) At not point in the front yard does the porch have a height greater than the depth of the front yard (Example: If the depth of the front yard is 20 feet, the maximum heigbt in the front yard is also 20 feet.) D��ed � FrameA Area- ATTACHMENT TO ZPC 4 -13 -2006 MINUTES Alternate amendments relating to "old stock housing" (Definition) 4 -7 -06 Amend the definition of "old stock housing" as follows: Old stock housing. One or more buildings on a site meeting all the following criteria: (i) the principal building was built more than 40 years previously with ° ^r-^s° t4„er afea of 1,700 sElaafe feet or less, and (ii) the gross floor area of all buildings on the site does not euffead e*eeed 3,400 squafe feet exceed twice the gross floor area of all the buildings on the site when originally _ built. or as follows: Old stock housing. One or more buildings on a site meeting all the following criteria: (i) the principal building was built more than 40 years previously with a gross flee~ afea of 1,700 safe feet or- less, and (ii) the gross floor area of all buildings on the site does not currently exceed 3,400 square feet. �16CU5F� � Famed ►� a-HaAmenf -D 4/13 ,Db zpC rr eji m;nu,t� Amendment to add "plate height" limit 4'4 -13 -06 Amend Table 7 -4b (both pages) as follows: Table 7 -4b• Buildings General Rule: Every structure must conform to the applicable regulations shown, by District, in this table.( "N /A" means the rule does not apply.) Exceptions/Special Rules: (1) See special rules -- ----- -•---- - - - - -- — noted in table. (2) See Article 9 regarding Planned Development Districts. Item i Regulation SF -1 SF -2 SF -3 TH GR -I GR -2 C Dwelling units Maximum number per One, plus one accessory quarters (AQ) ' 17.5 per Two 24 per See Uses building site acre. See acre. table and Note 8 Art. 9 Framed area, all Maximum area as a 80% 100% See Note 4. N/A buildings on a building percentage of building site site area Length or width, any I Maximum horizontal i N/A 130 feet. See Note 3. N/A .building_ dimension I Exterior materials, any Type N/A r Must be of equal grade and quality, all sides. See building_ _ _ Section 8 -104. Separation of DU's I Fire -rated wall N/A A four -hour fire wall, or its equivalent, must separate adjoining dwelling units. See Notes 3 and 5. _ SF privacy protection See Note 7. I N/A Applies. N/A Accessory buildings Maximum number per Three N/A building site j See Article 10 regarding garage space. Height, maximum Principal buildings See Article 10 regarding garage space. Stories, maximum Height, maximum 25 ft. 35 ft. See Note 2. { Two and one -half. I Three. ! See Note 6. N/A I i i 35- 25 feet See Note- h Note: This is a "plate height" limit. See Notes I and 10. 35 ft. See �— - —_- -Note 2_- I Minimum gross floor i 1,400 square feet, if used for residential ! 1,200 sq. I 750 sq. ft, each DU 1,400 sq. area purposes j ft., each ft. DU. • _ __ Width, minimum i N/A 16 ft., each N/A But see QMDS N/A Note 1. Antennas and Chimneys. Roof - mounted radio or television antennas on a principal building in a residential district may project up to four feet above the roof. The maximum height of chimneys attached to a principal building is the greater of 35. feet or four feet above the roof. Note 10. Pitched Roofs in Residential Districts. The followine may have a heieht uD to 35 feet: (i) Ditched roof surfaces (planes) which begin at a height below 25 feet, iii) building space beneath such pitched roof surfaces, and (iii) dormers with no more than square feet of interior floor area (each) and no more than square feet of interior floor area (aggregate, all dormers on the buildiny, site above 25 feet). . 'ea� ..r ATTACHMENT TO ZPC 4 -13 -2006 MEETING MINUTES Amendment to provide for "Qualified Pedestrian- Enhancment Developments" or " QPED's" 4 -7 -06 Add a definition as follows: Oualified Pedestrian - Enhanced Development (or "OPED ") means a development established by plat or replat that meets all the following criteria: Commercial District. The area lies within the C District. Rear Shared Parking. The plat includes the following_ provisions for off- street parking areas: (i) the areas are located generally at the rear of the affected building sites, so that interference with pedestrian access is minimized, 60 the parking is located in a reserve and designated to be shared, to serve all building sites in the platted area, and (iii) there are appropriate reserves for landscaping, screening, etc. and maintenance of all common areas. Streets, alleys, sidewalks, etc. The plat creates or dedicates appropriate easements, if necessary, for: (i) streets or alleys to serve the off- street parking areas and connect to current or future streets or alleys to serve rear parking areas on adjacent tracts, and 60 sidewalks. Area Plans. The plat complies with all applicable City plans for sidewalks, parking, street lighting, pedestrian amenities, etc. Title Block, Restrictions. The title block designates it a "qualified pedestrian - enhanced subdivision" and incorporates the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and Chapter 20: It must recite that all restrictions on the plat or incorporated into the plat shall "run with the land" and shall be independently enforceable by any person or entity having an interest in property included in the plat (which may include the City) and by any property owner's association that may be created. Any such enforcement by the City is an additional, alternative remedy for the City. Add a new Section 8 -116, as follows: Section 8 -116. Oualified Pedestrian - Enhancement Developments For a OPED, a special use permit may allow: (i) reduced and shared off - street parking, if the permit includes fmdings that the available off -street parking, when combined with other available parking, will provide sufficient total parking; 60 reduced or zero -width front yards, if necessary to allow a building to connect to a sidewalk; and (iii) reduced or relocated landscaping strips and provisions for qualified trees. In each case, the permit must include findings that the proposed development will comply with applicable City plans for sidewalks, parking, street lighting, pedestrian amenities, etc. The permit may require construction and maintenance of covered sidewalks and SF privacy protection (as described in Note 7 of Table 7 -4b). The permit may contain conditions to assure continuing compliance. Amend Section 9 -103 as follows: Tom, Owkr ATTACHMENT TO 4 -13 -2006 ZPC MINUTES 110 Section 9 -103. Procedures. (a) Submissiems. The appheant must submit a development plat (whieh fflay be the same .,1.,t submitted under- ., another- e.., inanee of the City, if allowed by , eh ethef froth fl .,ee\ and a development r-epeft eentaining a general deser-iption of the proposed development and an USU 1.11UL JU V11I1CCVT1 � 1 � ) ) ) utilities, ) (b) - Pr -eee�ing�repfeeessieg- pfeeedufe for— appiaTal of .. PDD shall be the Same as for- an amended te shew the PDD betindafies, and a PDD sehedule shall be added to this eFdiflaftee te provide the neeessai-7y Feplatiens. eensider-atiens. Therefore, fie per-sen is g-aafanteed er- assufed that a PDD either- will er- will not. be- aeted u e vefaI�Y Of Within I g .Fef� . 6ed of fifne, and no e span eve.. be eat:tlea Procedures and standards for consideration of PDD's are prescribed elsewhere in this ordinance. See, e.g., Article 14. Add a new Section 14 -103, as follows: Section 14 -103. Planned Development Districts, Special Use Permits (a) Generally. Both planned development districts(PDD's) and special use permits (SUP's) are amendments to this ordinance. They may only be adopted in those circumstances prescribed by this ordinance, and each PDD or SUP must 'comply with limitations prescribed for them in this ordinance. A written application by the owner of the affected property is required. (b) Submissions. The applicant for a PDD or SUP must submit: (i) a development plan and a development report describing the proposed development and discussing traffic patterns street areas, sidewalks, drainage, utilities and maintenance of common and public spaces-, (ii) any other items prescribed by this ordinance, and (iii) additional items the administrative official or the Z&PC may reasonably request (Examples: traffic impact analysis, detailed drainage analysis, etc. . (c) Platting. A subdivision plat (or replat) may be submitted and considered concurrently. A PDD or SUP may be adopted subject to approval and recordation of a subdivision plat (or replat). (d) Procedure: Consideration. The procedures for considering a PDD or SUP shall be the same as for other amendments to this ordinance. The review of a PDD or an SUP, like other amendments, involves extensive procedures and legislative weighing of policy considerations. Therefore, no person is guaranteed or assured that a PDD or SUP either will or will not be acted upon favorably or within any given period of time. No person shall ever be entitled to the approval of a PDD or SUP under any circumstances. (e) Map Notation. If a PDD or SUP is finales adopted, the administrative official shall add a notation to the Zoning District Map to indicate the affected area. • l• • Attachment to 4 -13 -06 zpc meeting minutes Edloe Street Landscape Improvements Preliminary Budget Information 13 April 2006 Trees........................... ............................... .........................$2,800 8 @ $350 each TreeGrates .......................................... ............................... $16,000 8 @ $2, 000 each Demolition of portion of existing parking slab ............................... $3,400 1,700 s. f @ $2.00 / s. f. Pavers, including new concrete slab ........... ............................... $15,300 1,700 s. f. @ $9.00 / s. f. Irrigation...................... ............................... .........................$4,500 Tap and meter, backflow preventer, controller, valve Total $42,000 r• �` r 1 Al .:g:5;� •:.6,a�,. . a" :rp;�:�" "ai'i:'''.bi:, �i.y:p °..,t,_,!:• ^,� �:,`. /:.:#I : l.. ° -! ad On ,1„ �:e .1,iµ: x,- '"°ilk: 1 �.;: - 1 �.. .i s �,'. ••� Z`j• •.,� 'r. .,f.. �: r��l�al•A.IgQ'�N': .. *j��; y'I q. �: .;Ti:a, a �.�•`� � � _ _ � � ,�,sa� , �:'t�: �_ +it ` :� •�htnlYdt,♦d��.t'. , r n �,,�'. ; �\ . ' ':"'' -• .Yk �jjl = NA-1- r • .... '.. �1:MCT1•'!'.'..Mi(!!_. -- -�. �. .._ _ __ �:+"CF.'n:l "' . � •''ti�'� IN4� � :^ql•°r �W,� ,troll �4::.!fP -1'P��yy��i: ��t�.'� ixN � _ '.IT..•�' .d,.:'. �I .,Ali' �,� , • .�,i is h.. ' k„ ry r y.. r r• _ y! 1 1,