HomeMy WebLinkAbout01032002 BSC Agenda Item 10 - '
•
.
Z' oggcc)) 21 > wocool < gjg2 0 0-4
,,-0, p) 61 = ...°
s-.' -0 `..< -, 0
5.
tneoc-3 -. -0
acAo9
c, 0
-, (Li 01 c 5 (D LI), 3,C) CD a 0 4)- -6 C 0 `'. '-.(° - °
CO lt, a CM
,Z (-) CD (c, a .-. (r) 0 .. -,.-... cy< c, •••Ik ''' U) 0 0
0 LC w: (p (<1
.z.
(/) 3 a) a o z
, -v 5 11
ET 0
-,,
C 0 0 0
-•, ow ,(7-, .
CD i = •-• - - 5
— ,
-o to D 6 4
Pi 0-
CD C. a
(a •.< 7.) c,j11,..? , C) -..:,, 7, 0
0.$
- 0 0 ,-.. . 0
01 CD co ....
co 1 c cAc..-4,"--Y VI CP
0 c? 0 d
....0 Ct. al (,..(7(sy) .
. 4
0 -a 0 c4 ?=. g ci) N
d'O
_ ...., -,.. -..-' z. k. -1:3 s tv co 0
-&-- (-)
. .. o o 1, 00 0 o
3 o n o n- D g
.
(n -)
.... - tr
rii' :-13 in
LP
m
"
(I) 0 a >
5 cv 0- 5 70
D tn
(I) ,,,a...
c do—
o
I
= =
CD
cv
=
,-*
III <A po 0 0 -I, -, 0 •,-- (1)
0 0 3 Z '111- C1) Cfl CP
-43 IC) 0 ,5 In
,...
* Ill cm
-A: ,..., o , < = 'V -c 2 A R- c
-0 'Tr 6 O 'eo- Ew
0. c_ -74: CD CD C C
CL a 7 17 SO —.
5'
o
7I co Co N >
-o cr
0 0 5 5 = .
,*
15 F 5 5 CD (T) 0
4 --- 5" C) o .......
cr) a) al w w NI 3 77
i -0 Q.
to a) ---1 o 0 = n co EF
o
Cl)
-3- 5=
0
co CD 0
0 0
-0 (I) 3 3
0 Cif
13 -0
0 C-5- 6
(15 0 g
7-
CDt
C
--s
C--b)
........
1 '`.-Z
-
-
i
,.------------''
t 1 ,
1
1:1 L.-6.
v>rj i. 0. r,
...„......„ --..... '7.:_____
"r-
C-i-='
r ....c
f 1 ,\ C._
.,-
r--Y P"'"r-k-
• --..
MUM
..,,,L) i
, -T---
--- >
;.' .
,
, ,.
rrai
....0 ,
rl „...
r rs
t
• ZONING & PLANNING
Review building setbacks (density/safety); coordinate with BSC on this topic
Review Kirby corridor/periphery (one size may not fit all)
Review comprehensive plan
Review drainage requirements; perhaps require underground on new development; coordinate
with BSC
Review code to ensure compliance with recent decisions on church development
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Communicate with ZPC concerning issues that may need to be addressed through code revisions
Keep ZPC informed about the type of variances being requested
. - BUILDING & STANDARDS
Review drainage requirements and coordinate with ZPC to affect changes
Revisit building quality (sheetrock thickness, lumber quality, etc.)without legislating
workmanship
Review building code to identify possibilities for change that would encourage retention of old
stock
PARKS & RECREATION
Review recreation programs to ensure they accommodate residents of all ages
Monitor park maintenance and make recommendations to Director, P & R
Review ARF development on city owned land on Braeswood
YMCA feasibility use study
RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE
Review pay-as-you-go garbage collection; make recommendations to council
Continue cardboard recycling efforts (after appropriate communications, no Wednesday pickup)
PUBLIC SAFETY
Promote citizen security
Address traffic issues as they are reported
Review on street parking policy
Strengthen, in coordination with PD, Neighborhood Watch and customize program to meet
needs of West U
Address tree maintenance and consider tree replacement program in easements
Address cut-through traffic
Design and print traffic survey for City Currents
FRIENDS OF WEST UNIVERSITY PARKS FUND
Fund raising for YMCA
City Council Special a, October 8,2001
• •
Mr. Menville stated that the Sidewalk Committee has been deliberating a number of
issues including proper placement of sidewalks in relation to the street and the narrowing
of east-west streets in Area 9. The streets affected would be Duke, Pittsburg, Carnegie,
Cason and Coronado Streets from Poor Farm Ditch to Buffalo Speedway, a total of 22
blocks. Although the Sidewalk Committee has submitted no formal recommendation
regarding this matter, staff is aware that there has been some discussion about a possible
delay. Providing information at this time would enable council to take action to delay
bidding of the project; however, staff has no indication of the amount of delay proposed
or the cost involved if bid specifications need to be re-done.
Mayor Lewis asked if anyone knew what the time frame would be if the project were to
be delayed.
Council Member May responded that the Sidewalk Committee did not have a time frame
but that the thought behind delaying the project was that the cost to delay the bidding of
the project would not be as costly as issuing change orders after the project had been
awarded.
After a complete discussion of this item, the City Council agreed to delay bidding of this
project for 30 days. A meeting will be held with the residents in the area on October 24.
Matters related to goals and objectives of Boards and Commission members and the
assignment of priorities.
The City Council agreed on the following goals and objectives for Boards and
Commissions:
ZONING&PLANNING
Review building setbacks (density/safety);coordinate with BSC on this topic
Review Kirby corridor/periphery(one size may not fit all)
Review comprehensive plan
Review drainage requirements;perhaps require underground on new development; coordinate with BSC
Review code to ensure compliance with recent decisions on church development
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Communicate with ZPC concerning issues that may need to be addressed through code revisions
Keep ZPC informed about the type of variances being requested
BUILDING&STANDARDS
Review drainage requirements and coordinate with ZPC to affect changes
Revisit building quality(sheetrock thickness, lumber quality, etc.)without legislating workmanship
Review building code to identify possibilities for change that would encourage retention of old stock
2