HomeMy WebLinkAbout04022009 BSC Agenda Item 3
STAFF REPORT
Business of the Building and Standards Commission
City of West University Place, Texas
AGENDA OF: April 2, 2009 DOCKET NO.: 09-02
DATE SUBMITTED: March 27, 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ORGIN: Development
Services
PREPARED BY: John R. Brown, MCP
Chief Building Official PRESENTER:
Mr. Salazar of Complete Care
SUBJECT: Contractor working without
permits. Contractor not completing work STAFF PRESENTER:
and receiving city final approval. John R. Brown, MCP, CFM
Chief Building Official
ATTACHMENTS: Letter from homeowner, Work proposal and scope of work, list of
uncompleted permits.
STAFF SUMMARY
Background:
On or about March 18, 2009 1 received a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Okcu the owners
of 6316 Westchester in the city of West University Place. The letter included a scope of
work along with a cost proposal. Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 on this proposal require permits
from the city prior to any work commencing. Plans should have been submitted for
review as well prior to issuance of any permits. Mr. Salazar has been performing work in
the city for several years and is aware of what requires permitting. Mr. Salazar currently
has a valid building permit for a two story garage with a room above at 5612 Mercer with
a valid electrical and mechanical permit however he does not have a plumbing permit
and the attached pictures show plumbing work being performed and a valid permit for an
addition for quarters above an existing garage at 3909 Villanova.
Action request:
Please review the information provided. I would like the contractor to explain to the
Commission why he did not obtain the required permits for 6316 Westchester and 5612
Mercer. Our code requires that upon three violations within a 12 month period his
contractors' registration can be suspended. This builder also has 14 building permits
and 5 tree permits still open and all have expired dating back to 2002.
Code reference:
Sec. 18-2. Permits.
1
0 0
(a) Permits, when required . Except to the extent expressly authorized by an effective permit issued by
the building official, it shall be unlawful for any person to:
(1) Erect, move, improve, remove, construct, enlarge, repair, convert, demolish or alter any structure;
(2) Engage in any grade raising;
(3) Engage in any pre-development activity; or
(4) Cause or allow any such activity at a place the person owns or controls.
(b) When effective . A permit is effective only if it has been duly issued in accordance with this Code
and has not:
(1) Expired;
(2) Been revoked; or
(3) Been suspended.
(c) Certain defenses . It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) The work in question consists of nothing more than ordinary maintenance activities on private
property, such as painting or wall papering;
(2) In the case of roof repair or replacement, the area of roof affected is less than 200 square feet;
(3) In the case of a fence, the work consists of repairs affecting not more than ten feet of the fence on the
owner's property, and there is no change in location, height or materials;
(4) The work involves only an alarm system on private property for which a permit is neither allowed
nor required by the Private Security Act, V.T.C.A., Occupations Code § 1702.001 et seq., provided that
the provisions of this Code applicable to alarm systems are followed;
(5) The work includes nothing more than replacing worn-out or obsolete items on private property (other
than a roof, a fence or an alarm system), and there is no structural alteration, no new wiring, no work
involving concealed plumbing or gas facilities and no potentially dangerous conditions;
(6) Another ordinance specifically provides that no permit is required for the activity in question; or
(7) In the case of development, the work in question involves an area on private property not larger than
ten square feet, and any structures involved are readily moveable at a cost not exceeding $300.00.
(Code 2003, § 6.102)
Sec. 18-3. Registration of contractors.
(a) When required . It shall be unlawful for any person to perform any work for which a permit is
required under this chapter (or to offer to perform it) in exchange for money or other substantial
consideration, unless such person is registered as a contractor as required by this chapter. It is an
affirmative defense that one or more of the following four sets of circumstances is present:
(1) The work in question is completely authorized by one or more licenses issued by or under the
authority of the city (for example, an electrician's license).
(2) The work in question is completely authorized by a license issued by the state (for example, a
plumber's license), and the license is registered with the city.
(3) The work in question is performed by the owner of the site in question without the involvement of
any contractors.
(4) The person is a regular employee of a contractor who is registered as required by this subsection and
the person does the work (or offers to do it) strictly as a servant or agent of the registered contractor.
The building official may require that registrants submit a properly signed city form, or other documents,
as proof of insurance.
(e) Expiration, etc . A contractor's registration becomes ineffective if:
(1) It is not renewed prior to the time that any of the insurance policies mentioned in the registration is
reduced, canceled or allowed to expire; or
(2) It is suspended.
2
0 0
(f) Suspension . The building official may suspend a registration for failure to maintain required
insurance coverage, subject to the same procedures applicable to the revocation of permits. If requested
by the building official, and after notice to the registrant and an opportunity for a hearing, the BSC may
suspend a registration, if:
(1) The BSC determines that the registrant is responsible for three or more building violations within
any 12-month period. "Building violations" include all violations of this Code arising out of, or relating to,
building or development activity. Violations of the standard codes schedule and violations of chapters 6,
18, 26, 30, 42, 46, 54, 62, 70 and 82, for example, can be "building violations," and this list is not
exclusive.
(2) The BSC determines that the registrant is responsible for any aggravated violation.
a. A building violation is aggravated if:
1. It is committed knowingly or intentionally after a specific warning or admonishment; or
2. It is committed knowingly or intentionally and clearly causes harm to a person or property.
b. Registrants are responsible for all of the following:
1 Building violations committed by the registrant's officers agents emaloyees or subcontractors; and
2. Building violations occurring in connection with activities under a permit for which the registrant is a
permittee.
c. Registrants are not responsible for violations if the registrant demonstrates, as an affirmative defense
and by clear and convincing evidence, that the registrant could not reasonably prevent them.
(g) Nature of suspension; proof. Suspension is a noncriminal administrative remedy, and registrants
are responsible for the indicated violations regardless of whether criminal convictions are, or could be,
obtained. However, evidence of a criminal conviction may be used to prove that an indicated violation
occurred. The burden is on the building official to prove violations by clear and convincing evidence.
Exception: The registrant has the burden on defensive issues.
(h) Length of suspension; effect, etc .
(1) The suspension period shall be set in proportion to the severity of the violations involved, but an
initial suspension may not exceed 90 days. Any subsequent suspension of the same registrant shall be
in effect until reinstated. When a registration is suspended, neither the registrant nor any "alter ego
entity" is eligible for new permits.
(2) The term "alter ego entity" includes:
a. Any proprietorship, joint venture or partnership that includes the registrant;
b. Any person under common ownership, management or control with the registrant; and
c. Any other person acting in concert with the registrant.
Any current permits held by a suspended registrant may be revoked or suspended by separate
proceedings.
(i) Reinstatement after suspension . Upon application by a person with a suspended registration, the
BSC may reinstate the registration if either of the following sets of circumstances is present:
(1) The applicant demonstrates clearly that the violations causing the revocation or suspension did not,
in fact, occur, or that the applicant was not actually responsible for the violations.
(2) The applicant has taken effective corrective action and has made all changes necessary to prevent
similar violations from occurring in the future. Reinstatement shall be conditioned upon compliance with
the then-current application requirements and payment of required fees.
(Code 2003, § 6.103)
3
Memorandum
To: John R Brown, MCP
From: Mehmet Fatih Okcu M FO
6316 Westchester, Houston, TX 77005
Home Phone: 713-666-8231 Cell Phone: 713.498-2712 Email: Okcx@sbcgobal.net
Date: 3/16/2009
Re: Remodeling at 3616 Westchester / 77005
Dear Mr. Brown,
As we discussed on the phone I am sending this memo to you to summarize the events that happened
during the process for the recent remodeling project that we had at our house located on 6316
Westchester Avenue, Houston, TX 7005. We hired Chris Salazar (Complete care Home
Improvements) on 10/14/08 for a project involving relocating an AC/Furnace unit from the second
floor attic to the 3rd floor attic, expanding the room next to the second floor attic by removing the wall
in-between, building a new closet space in the master bedroom and building an office space from a
small room attached to the car garage. A copy of the agreement is included with this memo. I
specifically asked him to check with the City of West University for the need of a permit prior to
starting. Few days later he told me that we did not need a permit for the project. He started to work at
our house on 10/20/09. As he was approaching completion of the project one of our AC units failed. I
bought a new unit from SEARS and during that buy I learned that they needed a permit to install the
new unit. I asked Mr. Salazar then to speak with the City of West University again and bring me a
letter stating that we did not needed a permit for the remodeling project. I told him that I will not pay
the last payment of $1,000.00 without this document. He completed the project before Christmas. I
called and left a message in his cell phone voice mail several times to ask about the permit without
any response. In February I contacted the City myself; spoke with you and learned that we indeed
needed a permit. I called him and told him about our conversation immediately. He came back on
March 3, 2009 and took the measurements to draw the plans for the project to submit for the permit.
He told me that he would come back with a City inspector after the Spring Break week. I have lived
in Houston since 1992 and lived in the City of West University sip 2002. I have not cone any
remodeling in my house and been aware of a need for a permit for a remodeling project..
Retrospectively, I feel partly guilty by busting him and not calling the city in the beginning of the
project. At no time I would think about doing sag against the law or city rules, as I have been a
legal resident alien in this county and have been working bard as a pedintrie oncologist at Tom
Children's Hospital. The main reasons why this happened is my lack of knowledge and mistaken
trust in Mr. Salazar. I am ready to do whatever needs to be done to correct the mistake and complete
this process lawfully. Please Id me know if you need any other informaticm.
Sincerely yours,
M. Fatih Okcu
1
COMPLETE CARE
HOME 1WROVEMENTS
10423 Ashland Bridge, Sugar Land, Texas 77478
Mr_ and Mrs. Okcu
6316 Westchester
Houston, Texas 77055
1) Disconnect plumbing and electrical to areas being worked upon and keeping remaining portion of
house continuously active.
2) Removal of existing A/C unit and relocate to other attic. To make ready for remodel.
3) Remove carpet in rooms being worked upon. Install new in entertainment room to match as close as
possible.
4) Build new office space at back side of garage and install new door to enter from house and close off
other. Install tile or carpet in this area.
5) Build and expand entertainment room to receive window at front of house also install two matching
windows in hall. Also build closet wall in back of bed approx 5ft. x 16fr.Also relocate door.
6) Build cabinets in garage as discussed.
7) Paint walls, cabinets and ceiling. Paint to be top of the line Benjamin Moore, Sherwin Williams or
I.C.J. .
8) Clean up of all debris during and upon completion of work.
9) Draws will he discussed and agreed upon with homeowner and General Contractor.
d§-~Lxj 4L J-00
I ) _ Total amount $25,500.00 + s01~) = -4'2' 6} 006
Acceptance of Proposal s y Su itted fo ILL
s~-
}
€lA~Ft~~
41
Y
S s
a, e
ry
'tt
orlk
all
F
s,r,
t~ 73 s ~ i.k~ ~ Y ~ ~;5r}N y^,7F . r, bit
4 ~ ' ~r?
r» A. f..
iij:
ys ~
.€s r .
~ ~ ~ toss
Mt Sn~ ~,v..
in,
x a ~j"